1. After reflecting on the CSI Normal team exercise, many different roles were played. It was clear we all played a contributing role in the mystery, especially because our team was was just three that day. Michael and Kaitlin played other roles as well. As far as task roles, Michael played a contributor role and Kaitlin played a "Critic" role. She is very good at playing "devil's advocate", which is good because I'm not always right. As far as social roles, I tended to play a calibrator role. Michael played the cooperator role because he's pretty laid back. Kaitlin played the communicator role.
2. Our team didn't do well in the boundary-spanning roles portion, which led to our inability to solve the mystery. More people to help would have been quite beneficial. The consul role is usually filled by Matt, but he is sick and Eddie does well at consul-ling and coordinating activities. This is where our team missed out.
3. Our group is probably still in the norming stage because we haven't done a whole lot for our team project. My hope is we get to the performing stage soon. This would look like the punctuated equilibrium model because we would quickly go from norming to performing.
-Ryan Luginbuhl
No comments:
Post a Comment